article response #2


I have a kneejerk reaction to strong-or discussions of print/publishing technology, and that is not because I disagree with online publishing (I’m a nerdblogger in several ways, I appreciate that) but because when the discussion gets often fatalistic in a way.  Books or digital.  One must die to allow the other.  (There can only be one?)

As I alluded on Twitter, so many discussions like this make me frustrated because the tone can be derisive.  Yes, everyone has access to digital publishing mediums.  Yes, some of what gets published is less “consequential” than others.  But describing content in such terms as below strikes me as a bit snobbish sometimes.  “Less valuable,” “trivial” – not entirely untrue descriptions, but they do carry a certain judgment, sort of implying that official publishers serve as a gatekeeper of what is “valuable” and “serious.”

As access to easy-to-use and inexpensive publishing technology increases, it becomes economically feasible to publish smaller and less valuable pieces of content. We have reached the point where anyone with access to the Internet can easily and cheaply publish trivial, tiny pieces of information — even single words.

Maybe that’s just my social justice side talking, though.  No, not everything that gets published online is of the same significance as a history textbook, per se, but – on the other hand, single words sometimes chronicle history as it’s happening and through the eyes of those experiencing it, not just an editorial gatekeeper removed from the situation with untold personal slants, and as a librarian, I celebrate equal access to perspectives, and will do my very best to maintain, organize, and apply metadata to all of those perspectives as necessary.

2 thoughts on “article response #2

  1. Thanks for your social justice take on this matter .. in the same vein, it’s interesting to note that certain groups of people have better access to the Web (say, at their homes with broadband access) and the time to post materials to the Web, which leads to more content that potential crowds out other voices (algorithms, too, can add to the problem of “hiding” certain voices way down the search engine results page).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s